European Union @ United Nations, Partnership in Action
 
 
EU-related events in and around New York City: learn more about academic programs and think-tank events, arts festivals and cultural activities.

 
EU in the USA - delegation to Washington, DCAbout the EU

< Back to previous page

EU Presidency Statement - United Nations ECOSOC: Delivery of humanitarian assistance

Summary: 21 July 2009, Geneva - Intervention by Deputy Director Mikael Lindvall, Permanent Mission of Sweden to the United Nations, on behalf of the European Union, ECOSOC humanitarian segment, Addressing the impact of current global challenges and trends on the effective delivery of humanitarian assistance

• Very useful and interesting panel discussion, that we would welcome returning to next year in ECOSOC.

• As stated in the SG-report, global challenges are exacerbating vulnerability and increasing humanitarian need. In addition to this we recognise that the triggers for humanitarian assistance are less shock-and-event driven. Instead, international humanitarian response is increasingly driven by chronic needs or cyclical crises.

• In order to handle these new challenges, the response must be flexible, efficient and better targeted. In this context, the EU would like to stress the importance of increased efforts in the area of preparedness in order to reduce disaster risk. The key is to focus on capacity building at local, national and regional levels. With the Hyogo Framework for Action we have witnessed significant improvements in the past few years. However, this is far from enough when needs are increasing in a changing climate, as was concluded by the recent Global Assessment Report on DRR. We therefore need intensified efforts among all actors involved including better coordination among key international preparedness actors.

• The EU would like to emphasize the urgent need to clarify coordination arrangements in early recovery and transition situations. We encourage increased information sharing and coordination between the humanitarian and development actors in order to facilitate a smooth transition, as well as avoiding gaps, between relief and development assistance.

• Questions

- In view of future humanitarian crises being driven less by sudden disasters and more by slow-onset, cyclical or chronic causes, what should be the role for humanitarian response?

- When we move away from traditional humanitarian action, in response to sudden shocks and events, and link it more closely with longer-term development approaches, what does this mean for IHL and humanitarian principles?

- Can the panellists provide any ideas on how the humanitarian architecture may need to change, in response to future trends? Today, it is built around national authorities, NGOs the Red Cross/Red Crescent Movement and the UN. Is this the optimal set-up for tomorrow?

- Some innovations in humanitarian assistance have been mentioned: cash transfers via SMS, use of Google and satellite imagery. Other examples? Also, can you provide more information on the Global Vulnerability system being set up by the UN?


  • Ref: PRES09-214EN
  • EU source: EU Presidency
  • UN forum: ECOSOC (Economic and Social Council), (including functional Commissions)
  • Date: 21/7/2009


< Back to previous page

See also
 

European Union Member States